Matthew 18:11
Wednesday, 25 March 2026
For the Son of Man has come to save that which was lost. Matthew 18:11
“For He came, the Son of Man to save the ‘having been lost’.” (CG)
In the previous verse, Jesus admonished the disciples not to disesteem one of the least of these, noting that their messengers in heaven see the appearance of His Father in heaven. Having noted that, He begins words which explain who “the least of these” refers to. It should be noted that most modern translations omit this verse or footnote it as being missing from many texts. He says, “For He came, the Son of Man to save the ‘having been lost’.”
Scholars argue over which texts are best and why this verse is or is not authentic. The words appear genuine enough, setting the stage for the next three verses. Without being dogmatic, they are worthy of evaluation because of this. In the Bible, there are several times that explain why Jesus came.
For example, in Mark 1:38, Jesus notes that He came to preach to the cities of Israel. In John 6:38, Jesus said He came to do the will of Him who sent Him. In John 10:10, He said He came that His people may have life, and have it more abundantly. Each reason given for Jesus’ coming helps us to see more clearly the greater plan of redemption that God has set forth for the people of the world.
In the case of Matthew 18:11, the reason is to save what has been lost. If Jesus were talking only of little children in the previous verse, it would mean that little children were lost and needed to be saved. If He is referring to those who are like little children, which the context demands, it still means that little children, of whom the one with Him is the example, are lost and need to be found, but they serve as an example of any person who demonstrates childlike faith toward His message.
The point then is based on what He just said. Jesus came to save humanity. How can the disciple disesteem “the least of these” when they are the very reason for His coming? Philippines 2:1-11 first refers to what it should be like to be in Christ, esteeming others better than themselves and looking out for others’ interests.
This is because Jesus left the glory of heaven and came in the likeness of men. Paul says, “taking the form of a bondservant.” If He was willing to do this, then how can we disesteem those He came to save who were lost in the wilderness of sin?
Life application: Myer’s New Testament Commentary says of this verse that it “is not genuine.” What if it is? Reliable texts include it. And the sentiment is in line with Luke 19:10, which says, “for the Son of Man has come to seek and to save that which was lost.”
If Matthew 18:11 was simply copied from Luke 19:10 as a means of reconciling the two gospels, why would the scribe leave off the words “to seek” found in Luke’s version? When there is doubt, the best option is to evaluate the verse anyway, note that there is a conflict between texts, and not adamantly assert something that may not be correct.
God’s word is too precious to fiddle with. Rather, it should be carefully handled and treated with the utmost respect. It is ok to not know everything and to admit it rather than be wrong about a matter.
Whatever side you lean towards in an issue like this, be willing to admit you were not there when Matthew penned the original. Defend your stand, but don’t adamantly assert without absolutely sure evidence to back up your claim.
Lord God, help us to always treat Your word with the utmost respect, cherishing it and carefully relaying its sacred content to others. Be glorified in our care for this precious word. Amen.
